LukeZaz's recent activity

  1. Comment on US President Joe Biden raises tariffs on $18 billion of Chinese imports: EVs, solar panels, batteries and more in ~finance

    LukeZaz
    Link Parent
    I don’t think the US is any better a pick when it comes to having market dominance over key future technologies. You mention underpayment and slave labor, but the States engage in that too — just...

    I don’t think the US is any better a pick when it comes to having market dominance over key future technologies. You mention underpayment and slave labor, but the States engage in that too — just look at the prison system for that.

    I’ll grant that it’s in the United States’ best interest to do this, but I don’t think even I as a citizen here will reap any of the benefits, much less the world as a whole.

    3 votes
  2. Comment on "twitter.com" is now officially dead in ~tech

    LukeZaz
    Link
    I find myself pushed more towards BlueSky by the day. Shit, Twitter tried to force me back on to the asinine “For You” algo-hell again just this morning.

    I find myself pushed more towards BlueSky by the day. Shit, Twitter tried to force me back on to the asinine “For You” algo-hell again just this morning.

    4 votes
  3. Comment on What is your opinion on Dan Brown novels? in ~books

    LukeZaz
    Link
    Hopefully I’m not misinterpreting the intent of “realistic fiction” here as a genre, but… I don’t think Dan Brown of all people is terribly good at factual accuracy, and so I’m not sure I’d call...

    but you also wouldn't be wrong in calling them Realistic Fiction

    Hopefully I’m not misinterpreting the intent of “realistic fiction” here as a genre, but… I don’t think Dan Brown of all people is terribly good at factual accuracy, and so I’m not sure I’d call his books “realistic” per se. The TV Tropes page Falsely Advertised Accuracy literally used to be called “Dan Browned” after him and the endless inaccuracies in his works. Hell, The Da Vinci Code was apparently notorious for getting things wrong.

    4 votes
  4. Comment on Some observations about some of the conversations here in ~tildes

    LukeZaz
    Link Parent
    Topic tag filters should be able to do this for you.

    just that a filteration option needs to be there for those of us who don't want to participate in this rhetoric.

    Topic tag filters should be able to do this for you.

    11 votes
  5. Comment on Some observations about some of the conversations here in ~tildes

    LukeZaz
    Link Parent
    Absolutely. I’ve probably not been doing this as much as I should be, but it’s very important and very appreciated. Key to keeping heat down. Hey, neat, I’m doing it right now!

    For example, also noting areas of agreement is important.

    Absolutely. I’ve probably not been doing this as much as I should be, but it’s very important and very appreciated. Key to keeping heat down.

    Hey, neat, I’m doing it right now!

    3 votes
  6. Comment on Some observations about some of the conversations here in ~tildes

    LukeZaz
    Link Parent
    Oi, not contrarian enough! YOU ARE WRONG AND YOU SHOULD KNOW IT! Mmkay, there we go.

    Oi, not contrarian enough!

    Yes, I'm defending the status quo. No, you can't stop me!

    YOU ARE WRONG AND YOU SHOULD KNOW IT!

    Mmkay, there we go.

    3 votes
  7. Comment on Some observations about some of the conversations here in ~tildes

    LukeZaz
    Link Parent
    The problem I’d see here is that effectively nobody’s sources are as varied as they think they are. That goes for all of us, really. I’d hazard a guess many people here, when they think of source...

    i.e. read the articles from trusted/varied sources and never read the comments.

    The problem I’d see here is that effectively nobody’s sources are as varied as they think they are. That goes for all of us, really.

    I’d hazard a guess many people here, when they think of source variety, are imagining engaging content from across the political spectrum… but in many cases are actually imagining content from across the American political spectrum. Or at least the imperial core. I mean, how many people here listen to news from, say, Cuba? I’d wager an answer somewhere in the region of “jack squat.”

    But this goes for me too. My news sources very much slant socialist. Neutrality is a myth.

    It is admittedly very comfortable to escape debates and restrict yourself to newspieces. But I can’t help but see that as inviting yourself into a bubble of your own biases; you selected for the news sources, after all.

    (This is not to say that avoiding debate spaces can’t be healthy! Everything in moderation, and all that.)

    5 votes
  8. Comment on Seattle’s law mandating higher pay for food delivery workers is a case study in backfire economics in ~finance

    LukeZaz
    Link Parent
    I’m going to be charitable and assume that by “not valuable” (a very gross choice of words) you mean “low-skill.” Not that that should matter, since “low-skill” jobs are still necessary for...

    What else should we do with people who are just kind of… not valuable?

    I’m going to be charitable and assume that by “not valuable” (a very gross choice of words) you mean “low-skill.” Not that that should matter, since “low-skill” jobs are still necessary for society to function and people working them deserve living wages too.

    Better that they subsidize themselves a bit rather than live entirely from the public purse.

    U.S. welfare is anemic at best. You are presuming these people aren’t simply left to die.

    2 votes
  9. Comment on GPT-4o in ~tech

    LukeZaz
    Link Parent
    Can I ask why you’re scared? I’m STEM-adjacent but I don’t find it very exciting either. More irritating, really, since I have no trust in OpenAI to do their work ethically.

    Can I ask why you’re scared? I’m STEM-adjacent but I don’t find it very exciting either. More irritating, really, since I have no trust in OpenAI to do their work ethically.

    9 votes
  10. Comment on GPT-4o in ~tech

    LukeZaz
    Link Parent
    I'm no expert on this, but I'd say almost definitely not. There's a lot of nuance to voice acting that this absolutely cannot replicate yet, and even once it can, I have my doubts that the AI or...

    I'm no expert on this, but I'd say almost definitely not. There's a lot of nuance to voice acting that this absolutely cannot replicate yet, and even once it can, I have my doubts that the AI or its operator will be able to reliably adjust the character of the voice enough to adapt to the requirements of a given performance.

    For comparison, I'm reminded of an (admittedly unverifiable) tweet that went around a while ago about how a company tried to hire prompt engineers to make AI art for their project, and how while some of the initial art was alright, the "engineers" were entirely incapable of adjusting the art in response to change requests, and ended up all being fired.

    19 votes
  11. Comment on GPT-4o in ~tech

    LukeZaz
    Link
    Am I the only one who felt like the female voices were sounding a little too friendly? Nobody I know talks like that in anything resembling normal conversation, and I can't help but wonder if the...

    Am I the only one who felt like the female voices were sounding a little too friendly? Nobody I know talks like that in anything resembling normal conversation, and I can't help but wonder if the space being very white-male-tech-bro is affecting the outcome again.

    21 votes
  12. Comment on Weekly Israel-Hamas war megathread - week of May 6 in ~news

    LukeZaz
    Link Parent
    It can be about more than one thing at once. But you’d have to ask the students about that. Though I am confident helping Gazans (and stopping Israel’s atrocities) is indeed the primary goal....

    It can be about more than one thing at once. But you’d have to ask the students about that. Though I am confident helping Gazans (and stopping Israel’s atrocities) is indeed the primary goal.

    Personally, I find divestment wholly insufficient on its own. But I suspect the students asking only for that feel they wouldn’t be able to accomplish anything bigger. Which I would not agree with, but I would understand — they’ve already faced a lot of pushback as is, after all.

    3 votes
  13. Comment on Is Nebula worth it? in ~tech

    LukeZaz
    (edited )
    Link Parent
    I haven’t delved deep into the clip, and so I only really have feelings to speak to, but in the interest of not having it go unanswered, I’ll just say a couple things: I have seen enough of Second...

    I haven’t delved deep into the clip, and so I only really have feelings to speak to, but in the interest of not having it go unanswered, I’ll just say a couple things:

    1. I have seen enough of Second Thought’s content that I am very confident they do not see all Israelis as occupiers, much less valid targets for attack.
    2. Despite this, I still heavily disagree with the statement itself. I do not believe that hostage-taking of noncombatants is appropriate, whether they are occupiers or not.

    Being as the Israel-Hamas situation is so ridiculously complicated, there are obviously millions of additional details I could expound upon here; for example, the massive difference in power between the two groups, or the inevitability of violence given how oppressed Gaza has been for so long. But I’m not trying to write an essay. Suffice to say: Taking civilian hostages is an unsurprising outcome, but it is still bad.

    All in all, I am inclined to believe the statement was a mistake, and that more nuance is present in J.T.’s actual beliefs. It is however worth noting that I am, as a frequent watcher of their content, obviously biased.

    I do still have questions regarding this clip, though. I can’t find myself very trusting of the person who posted it (seemingly extremely pro-Israel), but I also want clarification from J.T. as well. I might be able to get more details later. If I do, I’ll try to post about it here.

    1 vote
  14. Comment on Is Nebula worth it? in ~tech

    LukeZaz
    Link Parent
    …from Vaush? Eugh. I haven’t heard Vaush say anything worth listening to, and I have tried. Color me skeptical on that one. Anyway, he wasn’t kicked off anything. J.T. has said multiple times that...

    this rather damning video

    …from Vaush? Eugh.

    I haven’t heard Vaush say anything worth listening to, and I have tried. Color me skeptical on that one.

    Anyway, he wasn’t kicked off anything. J.T. has said multiple times that he felt Nebula’s stance on Israel-Palestine was too both-sides for him to be comfortable with, so they agreed to part ways. It was amicable, and there was no bad blood.

    7 votes
  15. Comment on Bike brands start to adopt C-V2X to warn cyclists about cars in ~transport

    LukeZaz
    Link Parent
    “Waiting for the perfect solution” implies that we don’t already have better options than this, and simultaneously that any such solution would actually get implemented. The reality is that our...

    “Waiting for the perfect solution” implies that we don’t already have better options than this, and simultaneously that any such solution would actually get implemented.

    The reality is that our politicians do not care about cyclists or pedestrians.

    14 votes
  16. Comment on Jack Dorsey quits Bluesky board and urges users to stay on Elon Musk's X in ~tech

    LukeZaz
    Link Parent
    For a joke, it's a pretty comfortable place so far. I have no expectations of it staying that way for more than a few years, sure, but that's how enshittification works. Right now, it's leagues...

    For a joke, it's a pretty comfortable place so far.

    I have no expectations of it staying that way for more than a few years, sure, but that's how enshittification works. Right now, it's leagues better than Twitter.

    15 votes
  17. Comment on Weekly Israel-Hamas war megathread - week of May 6 in ~news

    LukeZaz
    (edited )
    Link Parent
    Do you think this all started on October 7th, and nothing came before? Israel has been abusing the people of Palestine for over 70 years now. If you're interested in hearing more, I'd really...

    This entire situation happened because Hamas murdered and kidnapped hundreds of people. It's continuing because Hamas hasn't released them. Hamas can stop this literally any time they want, but they are choosing not to.

    Do you think this all started on October 7th, and nothing came before? Israel has been abusing the people of Palestine for over 70 years now. If you're interested in hearing more, I'd really recommend watching this documentary. It covers a small portion of what happened — namely the Gaza border protests. But suffice to say: Israel is and always was a colonial state. It stole land, and killed the native population to enforce such. It has continued to do so for decades since, stealing yet more land over the years. In modern times, Palestinians are second-class citizens in even their own country, as Israel controls access to food, water, electricity, and every border crossing.

    If anyone acted first, it was Israel and its allies. Hamas, and organizations like it, awful though they are, are the result of decades of abuse.

    Israel has an obligation to its citizens to recover hostages and minimize future attacks. Stopping fighting does exactly nothing to help that goal, and just gives Hamas time to rearm and commit another atrocity.

    I've said it elsewhere in this thread, but nothing Israel is doing is accomplishing either of these goals. All it serves to do is ruin their international reputation, further push the people of Gaza into supporting Hamas (as their choice increasingly becomes "fight or die"), risks the lives of the hostages by way of collateral damage, and last but not least, murders innocents en masse.

    [...] -- keep in mind they are the elected government of Gaza --

    The last election in Gaza was held in 2006. That is not legitimate governance.

    by holding and killing hostages while knowing that as long as they refuse to release the hostages, Israel will continue attacking.

    Judging by the past, Israel would continue attacking for some time anyways, and even after they stopped, would still be committing horrible human rights abuses.

    Hamas does not have the power to stop Israel in any way. I firmly believe Hamas should release the hostages regardless, out of simple respect for human life if nothing else. But I do not think for a second that Israel would stop killing innocents in response.

    18 votes
  18. Comment on Weekly Israel-Hamas war megathread - week of May 6 in ~news

    LukeZaz
    (edited )
    Link Parent
    So the answer is to... what? Kill everybody in Gaza, including the hostages? Because that's what they're doing. What they're also doing is massively incentivizing the people they're hurting to...

    Israel does not want a ceasefire under conditions that will lead to another October 7th the next time they've made movements towards peace that Gaza seems be responding to and don't have enough soldiers supervising the border.

    So the answer is to... what? Kill everybody in Gaza, including the hostages? Because that's what they're doing.

    What they're also doing is massively incentivizing the people they're hurting to join Hamas. That's what you do when you back people into a corner and give them no option but death: They join the nearest resistance movement they can, even if it's nasty as hell. Honestly, I'm impressed (and glad) at how many Palestinians are still critical of Hamas after all this.

    It's worth noting by the way that, before October 7th, conditions in Gaza still weren't good. It was and still is described as an "open-air prison" for a reason. And Gazans tried to remedy this peacefully. A protest in 2018-2019 sought to get Israel to back off and stop abusing the people of Gaza, and Israel responded with snipers on everyone from medics to children. Israel's government was never interested in peace.

    So Israel continues its campaign in order to try and exact a high enough cost that what they will eventually give in exchange for the hostages won't be viewed as "worth it" in hindsight.

    This will absolutely never work. Not only does deterrence virtually never work anywhere to begin with, it also presumes that those being deterred would care about the punishment. I think it's safe to say Hamas is more than willing to sacrifice Palestinian lives to accomplish its goals. Also, this is collective punishment, which is a war crime.

    12 votes
  19. Comment on Weekly Israel-Hamas war megathread - week of May 6 in ~news

    LukeZaz
    Link Parent
    This is true, but the way I see it, as I've articulated in another comment a bit ago, is that Israel is the one who's responsibility it is to get a ceasefire to happen. This is for two reasons:...

    This is true, but the way I see it, as I've articulated in another comment a bit ago, is that Israel is the one who's responsibility it is to get a ceasefire to happen. This is for two reasons:

    1. Rescuing hostages requires that the hostages be alive, and
    2. Israel is indiscriminately killing almost anyone they find in Gaza whatsoever.

    Hamas has done awful things; October 7th is no minor matter. But they aren't engaging in mass-scale collective punishment, nor are they even remotely capable (let alone attempting) to obliterate an entire nation. Israel is the one in power, here, and the one doing virtually all of the murdering now. It is on them to stop. If they want the hostages back – and I'll be frank with you, I don't think Netanyahu gives a damn – the best way to do that is to not raze the city they're in.

    10 votes
  20. Comment on Weekly Israel-Hamas war megathread - week of May 6 in ~news

    LukeZaz
    (edited )
    Link Parent
    Yeah, I'm sure Israel, the country that's currently committing war crimes by the bucket, is offering excellent ceasefires that anybody would accept. Look, I criticize Israel and not Hamas because...

    Yeah, I'm sure Israel, the country that's currently committing war crimes by the bucket, is offering excellent ceasefires that anybody would accept.

    Look, I criticize Israel and not Hamas because Hamas is not currently bombing an entire country to the point of ethnic cleansing. They physically can't do what Israel is doing. Israel is under a moral obligation to stop murdering civilians, and so it is their failing that a ceasefire has not occurred. I would be happy if Hamas were open to more kinds of ceasefires, but it's Israel who I distrust to adhere to human decency. This is because Israel is the government best poised to violate it, and – as the last several months have shown – Israel is scarcely held accountable for its actions.

    Besides, have you seen how Israel's spokesman and supporters in the country talk about this? They literally refer to Palestinians as "human animals," and claim incessantly that there are "no innocents" and that everyone in Gaza must be killed. Why is it the IDF you're worried about defending online?

    (edits: tone, elaboration. Trying not to come off as hostile, but this topic isn't an easy one.)

    18 votes